Second UED Vote
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
Member Minimal Points Limit To Join
Second UED Vote
In light of new events, it is time the UED had a change. (aka letting in a player with only 2 points, we all got to start somewhere, but we should have standards)
This is a second vote, I'm propossing.
If you still have yet to vote on circulars please do so, but ensure you now state which vote it is for.
Vote 2 is on the members of the UED. Who we should and shouldn't accept.
I think it is time any new members either have to be above a set amount of points or have to be within 20 systems of an active UED member.
I'm putting a poll here and I shall see your responses if you wish to leave them.
I will then take the vote to in game and see what happens, if I have someone who backs the idea in the forum.
This is a second vote, I'm propossing.
If you still have yet to vote on circulars please do so, but ensure you now state which vote it is for.
Vote 2 is on the members of the UED. Who we should and shouldn't accept.
I think it is time any new members either have to be above a set amount of points or have to be within 20 systems of an active UED member.
I'm putting a poll here and I shall see your responses if you wish to leave them.
I will then take the vote to in game and see what happens, if I have someone who backs the idea in the forum.
The Warick- Admin
- Posts : 63
Join date : 2008-08-07
Age : 34
Location : Australia
Re: Second UED Vote
The Warick wrote:In light of new events, it is time the UED had a change. (aka letting in a player with only 2 points, we all got to start somewhere, but we should have standards)
This is a second vote, I'm propossing.
If you still have yet to vote on circulars please do so, but ensure you now state which vote it is for.
Vote 2 is on the members of the UED. Who we should and shouldn't accept.
I think it is time any new members either have to be above a set amount of points or have to be within 20 systems of an active UED member.
I'm putting a poll here and I shall see your responses if you wish to leave them.
I will then take the vote to in game and see what happens, if I have someone who backs the idea in the forum.
The other members can be a Wing... :-)
Angel of Light- Posts : 10
Join date : 2008-08-12
Age : 51
Location : Norway
Wing
that would probably be another vote
and i just had to accept another player ranked very low
seriously I'm thinking I put it in before I have to do it again
mind you they might make valuable players, but out in galaxy 4 they aint much use to the bulk of the alliance
UEDxW
United Earth Directorate Wing
hmm....
DEW
Dark Earth Wanna-bees
lol
PWWGE
Players Who Weren't Good Enough
UEN
United Earth Noobs
AxWA
Another Wing Alliance
lol
well if it were to happen I'd need a leader for the alliance from the original alliance
and i just had to accept another player ranked very low
seriously I'm thinking I put it in before I have to do it again
mind you they might make valuable players, but out in galaxy 4 they aint much use to the bulk of the alliance
UEDxW
United Earth Directorate Wing
hmm....
DEW
Dark Earth Wanna-bees
lol
PWWGE
Players Who Weren't Good Enough
UEN
United Earth Noobs
AxWA
Another Wing Alliance
lol
well if it were to happen I'd need a leader for the alliance from the original alliance
The Warick- Admin
- Posts : 63
Join date : 2008-08-07
Age : 34
Location : Australia
Re: Second UED Vote
350+ is the minimum requirement I think ... it should increase over time !!!
Kiwis- Posts : 28
Join date : 2008-08-10
increase....
that of course would happen once a limit is set
probably the average player score should be the minimal limit
probably the average player score should be the minimal limit
The Warick- Admin
- Posts : 63
Join date : 2008-08-07
Age : 34
Location : Australia
Re: Second UED Vote
I would go as far as to impose a rank limit, rather than a points limit.
I would say around 1500 would be appropriate and move the rest of the players to a wing which they can move up from when they are the required rank. This may drop our overall ranking at the beginning Warick but to be honest there is nothing worse than a huge alliance of low ranked players. We would soon gain our points back as more powerful players would be attracted to our alliance.
We would soon have a small main alliance with perhaps 20-30 individuals who would be in the top 1000 and a larger weaker wing where our players can be supported and helped to rank up quickly.
I would say around 1500 would be appropriate and move the rest of the players to a wing which they can move up from when they are the required rank. This may drop our overall ranking at the beginning Warick but to be honest there is nothing worse than a huge alliance of low ranked players. We would soon gain our points back as more powerful players would be attracted to our alliance.
We would soon have a small main alliance with perhaps 20-30 individuals who would be in the top 1000 and a larger weaker wing where our players can be supported and helped to rank up quickly.
Apoc- Posts : 6
Join date : 2008-08-15
Re: Second UED Vote
Apoc wrote:I would go as far as to impose a rank limit, rather than a points limit.
I would say around 1500 would be appropriate and move the rest of the players to a wing which they can move up from when they are the required rank. This may drop our overall ranking at the beginning Warick but to be honest there is nothing worse than a huge alliance of low ranked players. We would soon gain our points back as more powerful players would be attracted to our alliance.
We would soon have a small main alliance with perhaps 20-30 individuals who would be in the top 1000 and a larger weaker wing where our players can be supported and helped to rank up quickly.
I am agreed .....
We need everyone, but they can build them up in the wing... then we see how serious player they are.....
Angel of Light- Posts : 10
Join date : 2008-08-12
Age : 51
Location : Norway
Circular about MRL
Second UED Vote
Member Rank Limit (MRL)
I am proposing we have a rank limit on those who wish to join the UED. This will ensure we are only accepting players who will be able to keep up with us in the stats and keep us as strong as we should be.
Members in the alliance under the limit could move to a wing alliance under a leader of our choosing.
Or we could simply keep the current members and just not accet those below.
The Vote is do we now implament a MRL???
48 hours to respond
you might want to talk the issue over in the forum (see internal page for link)
United
Every
Day
Understanding
Every
Detail
Fight for Us
Fight for Earth
Fight for Deuterium
The UED
-=-=-=-=-
thought it would be best to talk it through here
Member Rank Limit (MRL)
I am proposing we have a rank limit on those who wish to join the UED. This will ensure we are only accepting players who will be able to keep up with us in the stats and keep us as strong as we should be.
Members in the alliance under the limit could move to a wing alliance under a leader of our choosing.
Or we could simply keep the current members and just not accet those below.
The Vote is do we now implament a MRL???
48 hours to respond
you might want to talk the issue over in the forum (see internal page for link)
United
Every
Day
Understanding
Every
Detail
Fight for Us
Fight for Earth
Fight for Deuterium
The UED
-=-=-=-=-
thought it would be best to talk it through here
The Warick- Admin
- Posts : 63
Join date : 2008-08-07
Age : 34
Location : Australia
Re: Second UED Vote
Rank limit to be invited: top 1000 - 1050 I think ... and you should give current members who do not reach that rank (1000-1050) an appropriate time like 72 hours - 48 hours or something else (a week, 10 days, etc ...), of course - depending on their current rank, to improve their status otherwise they may be kicked out if they show no improvements ...
Kiwis- Posts : 28
Join date : 2008-08-10
Re: Second UED Vote
I would actually put the limit slightly higher than that to start with.
Around 1500 I would think, you would then put weekly or fortnightly increases of 50, so ranks 1450 and below, 1400 and below etc. This would keep our main alliance active and competitive, with members who get attacked badly being given maybe a week or two to recover.
To start with those who aren't within perhaps a hundred of that rank would be moved down, after all there is no point in giving a rank 9000 a month to improve to 1500, he/she would be far better of in the wing.
Around 1500 I would think, you would then put weekly or fortnightly increases of 50, so ranks 1450 and below, 1400 and below etc. This would keep our main alliance active and competitive, with members who get attacked badly being given maybe a week or two to recover.
To start with those who aren't within perhaps a hundred of that rank would be moved down, after all there is no point in giving a rank 9000 a month to improve to 1500, he/she would be far better of in the wing.
Apoc- Posts : 6
Join date : 2008-08-15
I will set a reasonable limit
but first the votes need to come in, so far i have three and they are all for
if you have yet to vote please do so
we have yet to decide if we should have a wing alliance
if we do get one i think down the track it can be fully absorbed back into the UED
for now the vote neeeds to be counted
Kiwis and Apoc you both are on the right track and your imput is greatly apreciated, thank you
if you have yet to vote please do so
we have yet to decide if we should have a wing alliance
if we do get one i think down the track it can be fully absorbed back into the UED
for now the vote neeeds to be counted
Kiwis and Apoc you both are on the right track and your imput is greatly apreciated, thank you
Last edited by The Warick on Sat Aug 16, 2008 4:50 pm; edited 1 time in total
The Warick- Admin
- Posts : 63
Join date : 2008-08-07
Age : 34
Location : Australia
Re: Second UED Vote
Thanks Warick, I don't know how to put my vote down, I will vote for a rank minimum of 1500 and vote for 300 points +.
Apoc- Posts : 6
Join date : 2008-08-15
Re: Second UED Vote
Apoc wrote:Thanks Warick, I don't know how to put my vote down, I will vote for a rank minimum of 1500 and vote for 300 points +.
Same here... I voted 300 + but it should be min rank 1500
Angel of Light- Posts : 10
Join date : 2008-08-12
Age : 51
Location : Norway
Re: Second UED Vote
Apoc wrote:Thanks Warick, I don't know how to put my vote down, I will vote for a rank minimum of 1500 and vote for 300 points +.
Well don't worry about voting up there, vote in game.
Vote yes and i'll be making a limit.
So far it's 3 votes....
The Warick- Admin
- Posts : 63
Join date : 2008-08-07
Age : 34
Location : Australia
Double Post
Damn it's no good when the forum is dead....
Anyway I have made a player points limit rather then a rank limit for now. As well as a system limit, any player up to 30 systems away from another UED player gets a look. If they are further away and under the limit it's a no.
That's the way it is.
Over 90% of the votes were nulled the rest were yes....
Anyway I have made a player points limit rather then a rank limit for now. As well as a system limit, any player up to 30 systems away from another UED player gets a look. If they are further away and under the limit it's a no.
That's the way it is.
Over 90% of the votes were nulled the rest were yes....
The Warick- Admin
- Posts : 63
Join date : 2008-08-07
Age : 34
Location : Australia
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|